Mar 29, 2011

A Call for Civic Education

I chose to look into the preface and the first section in Nightingale's Notes on Nursing. I decided to focus on the beginning of her manual to get a sense of how she is setting herself up, and what she is saying to get her readers attention. I also focused on her tone and how she uses it to connect to her audience.

The first time I read through the preface, I felt she went straight to her point without creating an elaborate introduction. She wrote the book with a purpose, and she was not going to waste any time on extra words. I appreciated her frankness and thought that this was probably very effective for her readers. Her work is set up like a manual, not only for the hospital nurse, for every women at home. She writes, "Every woman, or at least almost every woman in England has, at one time or another of her life, was charged of the personal health of somebody, whether child or invalid - in other words, every woman is a nurse." I thought this was a very powerful statement because she has just addressed the entire female population of England, willing them to read further into her text. In the first section she goes on to describe what constitutes nursing. Defining it simply as administration of medication and tending to the wounded.

But what she sets up later in this section, I believe, is of great importance. She goes on the develop the idea that preventative measures are just as important as controlling a disease. She also blatantly says that most symptoms are caused not by the diseases, but a lack of sanitation and proper ventilation. It is like she is bringing her experiences in the war and applying them to every day life and simple care. It appears to me that Nightingale is trying to reform the way people view health in England. She has done extensive research ,at this time, on the conditions of military hospitals and has been reforming them. She is arguing for a higher quality of military hospitals as a way to save the nation. Without a military England would not have been as powerful. So Nightingale is bringing what she learned to the public in a call for a civic education. She wants the populous to be aware of simple measures in hygiene and over all well being. I find this intriguing because she could just have easily brought up her ideals with the trained medical professions of her time and gained notoriety that way, but instead she felt this information belonged to the people. . I believe the tone of her writing is very important. It is informative yet calling the people to action. She does not want her book to be read and then set down, but rather, be the manual that people reference daily and adopt into their daily lives. There is a sense of urgency in the manner of her address to stress the importance of her words. This would have been very effective in reaching her audience. . I am still trying to form a more concrete idea for my essay, but at this point I see a connection between Nigthingale's Notes on Nursing and her Notes on Matters. The information she presents in Notes on Matters is more like a list and contains a lot of information. She condenses this informatio into a more readable form in Notes on Nursing. I would like to know how her two texts present a sense of civic education and how did the population respond? I plan on searching the jornal database on the blog for more background information.

2 comments:

Sam Ostrowski said...

Deirdre,

I have not been following the progression of the Florence Nightingale people as much as I have the other categories, but your title caught my eye and I thought I would give Nightingale a chance. I am very glad I did. Your analysis and discussion about Nigthingale’s ideas and goals fascinated me and sparked a linkage in my mind to some of the author female authors we are studying in this class and this project. It seems like you know a lot about your topic, but it seems like you might even be able to dig deeper.

In your introductory sentences, you mention how you approve of the tone that she uses throughout her work. I realize that later on you vaguely identify the tone as being more direct and you find it important, but can you pinpoint some actual words to describe the tone? I think that this might help your argument to grow a lot. Maybe her tone is sardonic in regard to the current state of health in England, or maybe it is very forthright about the procedures that must be implemented. I just feel that if you work to really identify how she feels about the different aspects that she writes about, your research and paper could be very strong.

Also, as I was reading I felt like you might be able to make some grand inferences about Nigthingale’s effects and her style. It seems to me like with the way she promotes the education and the way that she glorifies women as nurses, that she might be complicating gender in a way. There is the potential that she is defying the topoi of the time that housewives could only do minimal work and were not as strong as men. You touch on this when you mention Nightingale’s work in the army and how the army would be nothing with dead men in it; that the nurses play an integral part in warfare. But I was thinking that you could maybe pull this out more to show just how much Nightingale empowers the position of women in society.

It seems like you have some very strong thoughts developing for your final paper. Best of luck getting everything together.

Emily Taylor said...

I would second everything Sam has offered and add just a few more hopefully helpful suggestions!

I particularly noticed your attention to the layout of the manual, its frankness and its organization that is practical for women both in and out of the nursing field. I agree with you that this is helpful to her readers, this lack of extra verbiage, but I would also maybe delve into that a little more; was Nightingale trying to take a less emotional approach in order to respond to the fact that women are too emotional/less scientifically and mathematically minded than men? Is she perhaps taking the sex out of the writing so as to prove that working can be either a male or female experience? I think looking at some of her critics could help answer this question.

I also noticed your detail that, "she also blatantly says that most symptoms are caused not by the diseases, but a lack of sanitation and proper ventilation." this, to me, screams a critique of the health care system, which leads me to believe that this is not only an instruction manual but also a textbook, if you will, preaching/teaching her own opinions and views about what the system is like and how best to be a nurse within that system. In this sense I think it would be great to try and identify who her audience was that actually read her writings, where they were distributed, and who supported her statements and opinions.

I think you have a lot of great starting places, delving deeper will definitely unveil great areas that you could build on for the paper, great job!

Post a Comment